Tools:Bookmark and ShareText Size:AAARSSFeeds PrintPrint
Make a Comment2
News and Features: Inquiries

Washington may frown upon South Coast Rail

BY: Gabrielle Gurley
Issue: Summer 2010
What would Peter Rogoff say about the $100 million deal the Massachusetts Department of Transportation recently signed with rail freight company CSX Trans­porta­tion, giving the state ownership of 30 miles of track that could become part of the proposed South Coast Rail project?

Rogoff, the head of the Federal Transit Administra­tion, hasn’t said anything specific about South Coast Rail yet. But at a Boston transit summit in May, where he delivered a speech targeted at transportation officials from Massachusetts and across the country who are counting on federal funds to help build new rail lines, he made clear where he stands.

Washington may frown on South Coast Rail“At times like these it’s more important than ever to have the courage to ask a hard question,” Rogoff said at the conference hosted by the MBTA Advisory Board and MassINC, the publisher of CommonWealth. “If you can’t afford to operate the system you have, why does it make sense for us to partner in your expansion? If you can’t afford your current footprint, does expanding that underfunded footprint really advance the president’s goals for cutting oil use and greenhouse gases? Does it really advance our economic goals in any sustainable way?”

He also pointed to financial problems down the road. “Are we at risk of just helping communities dig a deeper hole for our children and our grandchildren?” he asked. “Might it make sense for us to put down the glossy brochures, roll up our sleeves, and target our resources on repairing the system we have?”

It’s an open secret that even if Massachusetts manages to find the $1.4 billion to $2 billion it needs to construct a new commuter rail line from Boston to New Bedford and Fall River, the MBTA does not have the financial wherewithal to operate it. The MBTA faces a nearly $100 million deficit in 2012, so any new operations would only push the authority deeper into debt.

The finance plan for construction of the line is currently scheduled to be unveiled later this fall after the Army Corps of Engineers selects one of the three possible routes—rail lines through either Attleboro or Stoughton or bus rapid transit along Route 24 and Interstate 93.
“We know it will be a mix of federal and state monies,” says Richard Davey, MBTA general manager and the Massa­chusetts Department of Transportation’s rail and transit administrator. “We need to be creative in terms of our financing.”

Gov. Deval Patrick, who is up for reelection this year, says he plans to make the long-discussed rail line a reality. Although bus rapid transit is one of the options being considered by the Army Corps of Engineers, it has few fans on the South Coast and Patrick typically talks about a rail link.

Should MBTA expand or fix it first?
But Rogoff reminded his Boston audience that most transit trips in the US are done by bus, and bus routes are a lot cheaper to build and operate than rail connections. “Communities deciding between bus and rail investments need to stare those numbers in the face,” he said. “Bus rapid transit is a fine fit for a lot more communities than are seriously considering it.”
The South Coast Rail project has fared poorly in recent federal grant competitions, even compared to other Bay State rail proposals. “For whatever reason, in two competitions, it hasn’t come out well,” says David Lub­er­off, executive director of the Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Gov­ern­ment and a strong critic of expanding MBTA service when the agency carries mind-boggling debt.

Three rail projects in other regions of the state have won a total of nearly $150 million in federal funds. West­ern Massachusetts picked up a $70 million grant for high-speed rail design and construction for its portion of the Con­necticut River rail project through New Haven, Spring­field and onto St. Albans, Ver­mont. South Coast rail lost out on its bid to secure $1.9
billion in the same round of high-speed rail funding.

To date, South Coast Rail has only received $20 million in stimulus funding (for a total of $30 million in federal funds since 2005) for the rehabilitation of three structurally deficient freight rail bridges that could also carry passenger trains if rail routes are eventually selected. Two other MBTA projects did as well or better: the Fitchburg commuter rail line reeled in $55.5 million to extend that rail line five miles, the seventh largest award in the country. Another $20 million went to improvements around the Blue Line’s Wonderland station in Revere.
2 Article Comments

Would you like to comment? You must Login or Create an Account to leave a comment.

Recent Comments View all 2 Comments
cchieppo
Says on 08.02.2010
at 4:44 PM
Let me see if I have this straight. For 25 years, the MBTA has expanded faster than any other major transit system in the country, even though we have been one of the slowest growing metro areas. No revenue stream was provided for any of it, so the T is now predictably on the verge of bankruptcy, and the answer is to... build more transit! To paraphrase that famous scene from "When Harry Met Sally," Can I have what he's smoking? David D'Alessandro's report last year is just the latest to demonstrate that the result of the expansionist frenzy is that the T is on the verge of a financial death spiral. Money is taken from maintenance to fund expansion, service quality declines, fares rise to cover the debt, and more people look for other transportation options. The recent influx of (borrowed) money for infrastructure has slowed the trend, but any gains will be ephemeral and we'll be in even worse shape than before if we go forward with South Coast Rail. I have no problem with a VMT charge or increasing the gas tax, but the reality is that any revenue must be used to retire at least part of the T's $8+ billion debt. Adding to the burden will finally tip the authority into that death spiral just when the Commonwealth can least afford to bail them out.
Jim Aloisi
Says on 07.28.2010
at 4:44 PM
Transit expansion has never been a more urgent priority for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. We cannot settle for a transit status quo that discourages modal shift, degrades mobility and access, pollutes the air, and stifles economic growth and prosperity. The solution to the transportation funding crisis is to find new, appropriate, robust and sustainable revenue sources, not to cut back on either state-of-good repair or expansion. South Coast Rail is - like extending the Blue Line to Lynn, and extending the Green Line - an important element of an overall strategy to position Massachusetts as a place people want to live and work in. It addresses issues of jobs growth, land use, social equity and mobility that are critial to our future. That is why last year I instructed my Planning staff to submit an AARA funding request for the repair of key rail bridges in New Bedford. That successful funding application will be the beginning of a movement toward restoring passenger rail service between Boston and the cities of Fall River and New Bedford. As Transportation Secretary I also proposed the introduction of a "vehicle miles travelled" (VMT) charge as one way to bring substantial net new revenue in. VMT, as well as either indexing the gas tax to inflation, or making the sale of gasoline (net of the gas tax) subject to the sales tax, will go a long way toward levelling the playing field and providing transit with the significant net new funding it needs to maintain and improve the system,and to expand strategically. It simply takes focus, leadership and the will to get this right.
Back to top

Login

Forgot Password?

 

* = Required
*
Username Required
*
Password Required

Create an Account Here!

Create an account with us to comment on stories and blog posts. Your account information will not be shared with third parties.

* = Required
*
First Name Required
*
Last Name Required
*
Screen Name Required
*
Email Required
*
Password Required
*
Confirm Password Required
*

This Article is also found in this Issue