Tools:Bookmark and ShareText Size:AAARSSFeeds PrintPrint
Make a Comment2
News and Features: Inquiries

41 munis, but no new ones since the 1920s

BY: Gabrielle Gurley
Issue: Energy and the environment
There are 41 municipal electric companies scattered across Massachusetts that charge, on average, 21 percent less for their power than the four investor-owned utilities that serve the rest of the state. But no munis have been established since the 1920s.

The reason utilities like National Grid and NStar have a lock on the business is because they can reject municipal attempts to purchase their assets in a town even after the Department of Public Utilities sets a reasonable price for them. Legislation filed by Sen. Robert O’Leary, a Barnstable Democrat, and Rep. Jay Kaufman, a Lexington Democrat, would change that, requiring a utility to sell its assets in a community if the DPU sets a price and a town agrees to pay it.

“The point of this legislation is to create competition so that the large investor-owned utilities don’t consider their service areas as God-given monopolies,” says Patrick Mehr, the statewide coordinator for the Massachusetts Alliance for Electric Choice, a group pushing for the change.

Even if the bill passes, few expect a stampede of municipal takeovers. A state study of the issue found that municipalities trying to break into the power business now would incur heavy debt burdens, exorbitant startup costs, and probably end up charging higher rates. “The idea of putting enormous new burdens on the cities and towns’ balance sheets…is not to be done lightly,” says Philip Giudice, the Department of Energy Resources commissioner.
2 Article Comments

Would you like to comment? You must Login or Create an Account to leave a comment.

Recent Comments View all 2 Comments
mikec1959
Says on 07.27.2010
at 12:16 PM
As has been shown in an economic model done for the No.Central MA area serving 28,500.ratepayers, a muni is the most cost effective and feasible solution for the area crippled with some of the highest rates in the nation and blue sky outages due to lack of service by the Investor owned utility UNITIL. It is nothing less than shameful that the common sense legislation that had been stopped in Ways&Means will not pass in this session. By the mere passing of this bill rates and service could improve
cc
Says on 07.27.2010
at 12:12 PM
As has been shown in an economic model done for the No.Central MA area serving 28,500.ratepayers, a muni is the most cost effective and feasible solution for the area crippled with some of the highest rates in the nation and blue sky outages due to lack of service by the Investor owned utility UNITIL. It is nothing less than shameful that the common sense legislation that had been stopped in Ways&Means will not pass in this session. By the mere passing of this bill rates and service could improve and perhaps the city of Fitchburg would actually have a chance of attracting businesses instead of being like a ghost town.
Back to top

Login

Forgot Password?

 

* = Required
*
Username Required
*
Password Required

Create an Account Here!

Create an account with us to comment on stories and blog posts. Your account information will not be shared with third parties.

* = Required
*
First Name Required
*
Last Name Required
*
Screen Name Required
*
Email Required
*
Password Required
*
Confirm Password Required
*

This Article is also found in this Issue