News and Features: Features
A gender achievement gap has males lagging behind females at every level from elementary school to college graduation rates. In an economy where education is now the key to a good job, that doesn't just spell trouble for men. It's creating a steeper climb for families to reach the middle class
November 03, 2011
each spring, the
Boston Globe salutes the city’s valedictorians by publishing photographs of the top-achieving student in each of Boston’s 40 public high schools and describing their college plans. Many of the students come from lower-income families, and it’s hard not to be inspired by the persistence they had to demonstrate in the face of tough odds. But something else also jumps out when scanning the portraits filling the newspaper page: Three out of every four faces belong to young women.
Girls are regularly outpacing boys when it comes to grabbing the prized honor for academic achievement at the city’s high schools. But that female advantage extends far beyond competition at the very top level. Girls are achieving at higher levels across the board in Boston—and in schools throughout the country—opening a pronounced gender achievement gap that has grown wider in recent years. The female advantage extends into higher education, where women now collect 60 percent of all college degrees. It’s an astonishing reversal from 50 years ago, when men were 65 percent of all college graduates.
What makes today’s gender achievement gap so alarming is that it is coinciding with huge changes in the economy that are placing an ever greater premium on education. Young men who have not obtained a college credential or, in too many cases, even a high school diploma, are tumbling out into a labor market that is punishing harshly those with low educational attainment. Manufacturing jobs, which once provided a ticket into the middle class for those without college education, have been disappearing for several decades. The recession has taken a further huge toll on sectors where men make up the lion’s share of the workforce. “Traditional male employment got killed,” says Mark Erlich, executive secretary-treasurer of the New England Regional Council of Carpenters, 25 to 30 percent of whose members are out of work.
“Men have been left behind,” says Ira Rubenzahl, president of Springfield Technical Community College. But lagging male achievement is not leaving only men behind. Men without steady earnings also do a poor job at making family commitments. What’s more, women are reluctant to marry men of lower educational attainment, so the gender gap is threatening the social fabric of entire communities, holding back the formation of strong families and entry to the middle class.
In the 1970s, marriage rates were comparable among males with and without college degrees. Today there is a gap of about 20 percentage points in marriage rates between those groups. One thing that has changed over this period is the ability of men without post-secondary education to earn a middle-class wage. “A man’s ability to be a good breadwinner is probably the strongest predictor of when marriage occurs,” says Sara McLanahan, a Princeton University sociologist who has studied the retreat from marriage in low-income communities.
“We’re losing guy employment,” says Tom Mortenson of the Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education, a Washington, DC, policy organization. “And if our identity is found in the work we do, we can’t be fathers or providers or protectors or much of anything else unless we have jobs.”
Nothing has come easy to Tameika Heathman. The 22-year-old Springfield resident spent her teens in foster homes following the death of both of her parents. At 17, she got pregnant and dropped out of high school.
She ended up on welfare with her daughter, but was able to complete her high school requirements. “They went back to my high school records and my MCAS scores and said, ‘Oh, you’re really smart, you got good grades for the most part,’” she says.
Today, Heathman is a psychology major at Holyoke Community College whose goal is to work as a clinician with children in the state foster care system. “There’s probably lots of kids who could use help from somebody who knows what’s going on, not just somebody who’s pretending to care,” she says. “I have to go for my bachelor’s and my master’s, so HCC is just a start,” she says of the two-year college.
Her daughter’s father, with whom Heathman is still involved “on and off,” has been on a very different path. He dropped out of high school, never returned to it, and has no job. He takes care of their daughter these days when Heathman is at school. “He’s been trying to go back and get his GED,” she says, though he has been hampered by a reading learning disability.
Heathman’s determination to get her life back on track, combined with the ability she already showed in high school before getting pregnant, reflect the edge in academic achievement—and in the drive to channel it to productive use—that females are showing throughout the K-12 and higher ed systems. Her boyfriend’s story, meanwhile, sadly mirrors the experience of far too many young men.
On the 2010 MCAS exam, there was an 8 percentage point gap separating Massachusetts third-grade girls from boys in English language arts proficiency. Sixty-seven percent of all girls statewide scored proficient while just 59 percent of boys reached that level. For seventh graders, there was an even larger 11 percentage point gap in English proficiency. Math had been an area where boys retained an edge, but even here girls are now moving into the lead.
A 2006 report from the Rennie Center for Education Research and Policy found that the gender gap favoring girls was more pronounced in Massachusetts than the country as a whole. The same report pointed to other areas where males are struggling. More than two-thirds of those in special education are boys, and the dropout rate for boys is higher than for girls.
The higher high school graduation rates for girls, then, play out in college attendance rates. About 60 percent of college students nationally are women, a figure that has been rising steadily for several decades. “Not only are women attending more, they’re doing better across the board,” says William Messner, president of Holyoke Community College. “Men are more prevalent in our developmental courses [remedial classes required of those whose skills aren’t up to college standards], they have higher drop-out rates, and lower graduation rates.”
Clint Bilodeau of Belchertown took a buyout from his manufacturing job
and got training to drive trucks. Photo by Brian McDermott.
The Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University tracked the experience over seven years of all of those graduating from the Boston public schools in 2000 to see how students were faring in their pursuit of post-secondary education. The overall finding was sobering: Of those who enrolled in college, only 35 percent had obtained a two- or four-year degree within seven years. But the study also showed an enormous gender gap in degree attainment. For every 100 men in the Class of 2000 who had obtained a four-year college degree, 146 women had done so. There were very big differences in the gender gap according to race. The gender differences among whites and Asians were minimal, but for every 100 black males who obtained degrees, 220 black women did. For Hispanics, 214 women received four-year degrees for every 100 men who did so.
“These are disastrous numbers,” says Jeff Howard, a member of the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education. “We know the association between any kind of post-high school degree and family income. If you’ve got a 2-to-1 disparity, you’re just not going to have the solid middle-class family formation that you’re looking for, that you need.”
Running in place
There is no single explanation for the gender disparities in education. Brian Jacob, an economist at the University of Michigan, has suggested that women’s superior “non-cognitive” abilities—attentiveness, organizational skills, and a willingness to seek out help when needed—play a significant role in their greater college attendance rates.
Some have zeroed in on the idea of innate differences between boys and girls. It is a line of thinking that has been made popular by Leonard Sax, a Pennsylvania physician whose book Why Gender Matters has become a popular guide for advocates of single-gender classrooms.
Whether or not there are important “hardwired” differences between boys and girls that affect learning, those who work most closely with students invariably make the same observation when trying to explain why boys are having so much more trouble in school: They have a much harder time sitting still.
“Boys typically are much more active, they just need to move more,” says Josh Zoia, founder of the KIPP Academy charter school in Lynn.
That urge for kinetic movement, some say, has run head-on into the standards-and-accountability era in US schools, which has ratcheted up the focus on academics and led to more in-your-seat instruction and testing. “I’m a high standards guy,” says Neil Sullivan, executive director of the Boston Private Industry Council, a nonprofit that directs school-to-career training programs. But he says we need to figure out approaches to classroom learning that will raise achievement without relying on relentless desk-based testing. “It’s certainly not effective on one side of the gender gap, where we know more active engagement works better with boys,” says Sullivan.
Richard Whitmire, author of Why Boys Fail, thinks the reason girls are outpacing boys—a phenomenon occurring across most developed countries—has to do with an overall heightened emphasis on verbal skills in education and in society and the work world more generally. He says schools have failed to adjust to take account of boys’ slower development of these skills in the early grades, setting boys on a downward spiral. “The whole school reform movement inadvertently disadvantaged boys by pushing verbal skills at the earliest grades, where boys are not able to keep up,” he says. “What happens is boys get discouraged, and they think school is for girls.”
Keith Motley, chancellor of the University of Massachusetts Boston, is chairing Success Boston, an initiative formed in the wake of the 2008 Northeastern University study that is aimed at improving the dismal college graduation rates of Boston public schools graduates who go on to higher education. Thirty-eight area colleges have joined together and pledged to provide more aggressive advising and support for Boston students who enroll at their institutions.
But like Whitmire, Motley, an African-American who has long championed mentoring programs for young minority males, sees the difficulties for boys starting well before college. “Around third or fourth grade, students, particularly males, become a little disinterested and a little disorganized around traditional schooling,” he says. Boys who are “a little anxious or won’t sit still are labeled problems,” says Motley, and soon “the new norm is that you’re someone who can’t perform.”
Overshadowing various theories about learning differences is a factor that has obvious implications for boys: the absence of fathers in many low-income households. Nearly two-thirds of black children and 38 percent of Hispanic children in the US live in a household headed by a single-parent, overwhelmingly a female. The comparable figures for white and Asian children are 23 percent and 16 percent, respectively.
“Unfortunately, for far too many of our young boys there is not a father figure in their life,” Zoia says of the KIPP school in Lynn, where 80 percent of the students are black or Hispanic. “I think that’s one of the reasons boys in urban areas are falling behind.”
The impact of fatherlessness also predicts poor performance for those males who do reach college. Thomas DiPrete, a sociologist at Columbia University, tracked the outcomes of college students and found that males who grew up in a home without a father were significantly less likely to complete their studies and obtain a degree.
Looking for answers
KIPP Academy Lynn, a 5-8 grade charter school, has delivered impressive results since opening its doors in 2004. KIPP has an extended school day and longer school year, so its 390 students have 50 percent more time in school than district public school students. On the most recent MCAS exam, its eighth-grade students reached proficiency in math and English at rates substantially higher than those in the Lynn district schools and even slightly above the statewide average. Despite the strong overall results, the school has a persistent gender achievement gap.
The KIPP philosophy emphasizes a willingness to adapt to do whatever it takes to help students succeed. “If there a problem, we look for a better way. If there is a better way, we find it,” reads a list of KIPP mottos.
In that spirit, the school took a dramatic step last year in an effort to close the gender achievement gap: it formed single-gender classrooms for two-thirds of the school’s sixth graders. The school created one all-boys class and one all-girls class, while a third class was a conventional, mixed gender room. “It was very apparent to us that the way we’ve been teaching the boys wasn’t effective,” says Zoia.
Ricardo Pinto, a seventh grader at KIPP who was in last year’s all-boys classroom, says despite some initial reservations among students, the experiment proved popular, and he thinks it helped the boys move forward. “Instead of having girls in the class answering all the questions, it was just us,” he says. “We were going to have to do the work by ourselves.”
Teachers in the single-gender classrooms were also able to tailor readings toward the interests of boys or girls. And they incorporated more active elements into the boys’ class, such as a game using flash cards placed around an outdoor running track. “It’s not about lowering the standard,” says sixth grade teacher Beth McPhail. “Academic achievement is of course the end game.”
“The idea isn’t to make excuses,” says Zoia. “It’s to say, kids learn in all sorts of different ways.”
The KIPP experiment with single-gender classes was in no way a rigorously designed research study. The results were nonetheless encouraging, with those in the all-boys’ class showing more growth in English and math scores than boys in the mixed gender classroom. KIPP has broken its sixth grade into single-gender classrooms again this year, and school leaders say they may consider extending the model to other grades.
Research on single-gender schooling has not shown a clear-cut benefit, but there is growing interest in trying the approach as educators search for strategies that might close the gender gap. In 2008, Boston school superintendent Carol Johnson announced that she wanted to experiment with single-gender schools, but she abandoned the plan last year when it was concluded that state law prevents districts from setting up entire schools as single-gender academies.
“They’ve been very successful academically” in other cities, Johnson says of single-gender schools. “We’d like to try it.”
Paul Reville, the state secretary of education, says he would support efforts to permit single-gender schools, and Boston officials have submitted legislation each of the last several years to change state law to allow single-gender schools. However, the measure hasn’t advanced in the Legislature.
Other efforts to address the gender gap involve mentoring programs that give added attention to boys and more intensive advising systems for young men in college to keep them on track toward a degree.
In 2007, Boston launched a program called 10 Boys Clubs. The initiative, which is in place in about a third of the city’s schools, identifies 10 black or Latino boys at each school who scored in the “needs improvement” category on the MCAS test, one level short of proficient, and assigns them extra tutoring, and regular meetings as a group where they hear guest speakers, who are often successful black and Latino professional men.
Community colleges are also making an extra effort to reach out to minority male students, who are at particularly high risk of dropping out. Three years ago, Springfield Technical Community College started a mentoring program for black and Latino male students, which also offers drop-in hours for students who are having any school-related problem. Male students “tend to have a lower tolerance for frustration,” says Rubenzahl, the college’s president. “So if they don’t get the issue resolved, they often just leave.”
Not a man’s world
There was a time not that long ago when an education achievement gap that had men lagging behind women would not have been particular cause for alarm. In the heyday of US manufacturing in the decades after World War II, factories were hiring high school graduates and union contracts delivered the sort of wages and benefits that put workers, if not exactly on easy street, solidly within a broadly defined middle class.
Those days, however, are gone, which is why the plight of boys who fall behind now is so dire and why the urgency of dealing with the gender achievement gap is so great.
The recession has only put an exclamation mark on the trend. The heavy concentration of job losses in the male-dominated manufacturing and construction sectors led some to dub the downturn a “mancession.” In Massachusetts, male job losses have been among the worst in the country, with men accounting for all of the net loss of positions during the recession.
Nobody needs to tell that to Clint Bilodeau. The 53-year-old Belchertown resident went straight to work after high school, and spent 34 years at the Callaway sporting goods manufacturing plant in Chicopee, the only job Bilodeau ever had. Last November, it all ended. The plant, which was once bustling with 1,200 workers, is now down to about 150 employees, as the company has shifted most of its manufacturing to plants in Mexico and China. Bilodeau, who thinks it’s only a matter of time before the factory is closed entirely, took a buy-out package that gave him 21 weeks of severance pay.
“I lost 34 years of my life for nothing,” says Bilodeau, who bitterly recalls assurances from management over the years that they wouldn’t move jobs out of the country.
Bilodeau falls in the demographic of those men out of work who may be facing the toughest challenge: He has no post-secondary education to fall back on and feels he’s too old and far removed from classroom days to think about college now. Instead, tapping into federal job training funds available to workers whose jobs have moved out of the country, Bilodeau obtained a Class 1 license qualifying him to drive semi trucks.
Bilodeau’s hope is to land a truck-driving job, “do this for another 13, 14 years, then retire.”
Cleveland Cumby, 33, didn't complete a college degree after high school but
now he's back studying computer systems engineering. Photo by Brian McDermott.
Cleveland Cumby, a 33-year-old Springfield native, spent 13 years at Callaway before he also took the buy-out last fall. After graduating from high school, he spent a semester each at Holyoke Community College and Salem State College, but then became another statistic in the tally of male college dropouts. “I got that credit card my mom told me not to get,” says Cumby. With bills to pay, his horizon turned short-term and he dropped out of school for a job at the plant, which was still hiring then. “The money sounded good,” he says of the $17 an hour one could work up to at Callaway.
Today, he’s back in school, this time at Springfield Technical Community College in a computer systems engineering program. He says he’s determined to see it through and get a two-year associate’s degree, and he hopes to push on and get a four-year degree. Cumby, who is not married and has no children to support, thinks getting dislodged from his factory job will, in the long run, be a blessing. “I’m rejuvenated,” he says. “I was mad I didn’t stay with it at the time,” he says of his earlier stint in higher ed.
Cumby is hoping to climb out of the shaky world of blue-collar employment and onto the firmer footing that comes with a college degree. Notwithstanding all the stories of college grads unable to land jobs, the US unemployment rate in September was 4.2 percent for those with at least a four-year degree and 9.7 percent for those who only completed high school. It stood at 14 percent for those with no high school diploma. What’s more, the financial returns on college education have increased significantly. Three decades ago, the typical college graduate earned 50 percent more than a typical high school graduate. By 2009, this “wage premium” had increased to nearly 100 percent.
MIT economist David Autor says two big forces have been working in tandem to deliver a devastating blow to US men. First, huge impacts from globalization have hollowed out the US economy of many mid-level jobs, making a much bigger share of jobs either high-wage jobs that require more formal education or low-skill, low-wage jobs, many of them service-sector positions that can’t be shipped offshore. The second factor has been the education gender gap, which has put men and women on very different paths as these mid-level jobs disappeared.
“Females primarily moved upward in the distribution as they departed the center,” Autor wrote in a paper last year. “Male employment instead moved in roughly equal measures” toward the top and bottom, to the “high-wage, high-skill and low-wage, low-skill jobs.” Men are being “squeezed between declining demand and not increasing supply,” Autor says in an interview. “The demand for the typical employment in which they’re engaged is declining, and the supply of skills among men that would offset that is not increasing.”
A drag on middle-class hopes
“It’s tempting in one sense to say boys are falling behind girls. I think the bigger issue is that boys are falling behind in the changes that are occurring in the economy,” says Mortenson of the Pell Institute. “The girls are getting ready for the jobs the economy is producing, and you have to wonder, what are the boys doing?”
“The rising educational attainment of women is great,” says Autor. “I’m not implying that men’s losses are their gains. It’s simply the case that men are not rising as fast, and it has many ill consequences—and not just for men.”
It means incomes are not keeping pace in families that rely on male earnings. What’s more, because research shows women are inclined to want to marry someone of comparable educational background, the gender education gap is both a cause and consequence of the increasingly fragile state of families in lower-income and minority communities.
“It’s sort of a vicious cycle,” says McLanahan, the Princeton sociologist who specializes in family studies. “The men aren’t doing well so the women don’t want to marry them. But then by not marrying them and giving them the responsibility of family and children, it takes away a motivator that might make them work harder.”
Meanwhile, the downward spiral continues with boys born into the increasing number of households headed by a single mother. With no father in their home, they are less likely to make it through college to a place where they’ll be both a more solid wage-earner and more attractive marriage partner.
Social historian Barbara Dafoe Whitehead has spent years connecting the dots between family-structure dynamics and changes in the American economy and labor market. “Two things that continue to define the middle-class American Dream are some level of financial security and some level of competence and success in child rearing,” she says. “So when men drop out of education and when they drop out of marriage, you have a huge threat to the American Dream, especially the American Dream as it’s lived by what we hope is a broad and expanding middle class.”
Illustration by Shout.